<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tucson Real Estate Absorption Rates July 2007</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/</link> <description>&#38; What it is like living in Tucson</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:05:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/#comment-776</guid> <description>The flip flop has a lot to do with a great June for that area.  It is back to just below April level for the E.
Apr 7.89
May 5.70
Jun 4.44
Jul 7.84
So it is a big jump back for the area, but not a concern for the overall picture of only 0.84 swing for Tucson in July</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flip flop has a lot to do with a great June for that area.  It is back to just below April level for the E.</p><p>Apr 7.89<br
/> May 5.70<br
/> Jun 4.44<br
/> Jul 7.84</p><p>So it is a big jump back for the area, but not a concern for the overall picture of only 0.84 swing for Tucson in July</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Concerned</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link> <dc:creator>Concerned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/#comment-775</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;Actually the flip flop is expected, because for the past 4 out of 5 years July has been a slow month. I didnâ€™t post the difference, but in most cases it was by 2 to 3 hundred fewer homes in July than June, so a -128 is actually better than the past few years.&lt;/i&gt;
I&#039;ve noticed July has been slower before, too, but then August is about the only potentially good month of the year left. I meant the flip-flop between the East and the Southwest side by 3+ months of inventory up and down respectively in comparison to last month. I don&#039;t believe the East side has become less desirable (or North for that matter) all of a sudden. It&#039;s just pricier than the SW.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Actually the flip flop is expected, because for the past 4 out of 5 years July has been a slow month. I didnâ€™t post the difference, but in most cases it was by 2 to 3 hundred fewer homes in July than June, so a -128 is actually better than the past few years.</i></p><p>I&#8217;ve noticed July has been slower before, too, but then August is about the only potentially good month of the year left. I meant the flip-flop between the East and the Southwest side by 3+ months of inventory up and down respectively in comparison to last month. I don&#8217;t believe the East side has become less desirable (or North for that matter) all of a sudden. It&#8217;s just pricier than the SW.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/#comment-774</guid> <description>Actually the flip flop is expected, because for the past 4 out of 5 years July has been a slow month.  I didn&#039;t post the difference, but in most cases it was by 2 to 3 hundred fewer homes in July than June, so a -128 is actually better than the past few years.
I think a lot has to do with the monsoon humidity driving people out of town and many take July for their vacations before the early start of the school year here in Tucson.
I agree, let the ducky go. . .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the flip flop is expected, because for the past 4 out of 5 years July has been a slow month.  I didn&#8217;t post the difference, but in most cases it was by 2 to 3 hundred fewer homes in July than June, so a -128 is actually better than the past few years.</p><p>I think a lot has to do with the monsoon humidity driving people out of town and many take July for their vacations before the early start of the school year here in Tucson.</p><p>I agree, let the ducky go. . .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Concerned</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link> <dc:creator>Concerned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-real-estate-absorption-rates-july-2007/#comment-773</guid> <description>Hey, it&#039;s true - you ask, you&#039;ll be given!;-)) Thanks.
Things don&#039;t look good, though... Again, it depends on who hopes for what.;-) This flip-flop IS strange. What happened? All of a sudden this month people&#039;s preferences changed? Most likely it&#039;s not the preferences, but the pockets... They got shallower. As cute as your duckie is, it&#039;s probably best if he goes away to play with his buddies in the pond.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s true &#8211; you ask, you&#8217;ll be given!;-)) Thanks.</p><p>Things don&#8217;t look good, though&#8230; Again, it depends on who hopes for what.;-) This flip-flop IS strange. What happened? All of a sudden this month people&#8217;s preferences changed? Most likely it&#8217;s not the preferences, but the pockets&#8230; They got shallower. As cute as your duckie is, it&#8217;s probably best if he goes away to play with his buddies in the pond.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
