<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tucson Home Sellers The Big Gamble</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/</link> <description>&#38; What it is like living in Tucson</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: bobby joe</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link> <dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-680</guid> <description>As I said on May 18th here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-foreclosures-and-the-subprime-buyers/&quot;&gt;Tucson Foreclosures and the subprime buyers&lt;/a&gt;
I finally have some &quot;real&quot; meat on the bones people agreeing with my stance. Bill Gross of Pimco wrote:
&quot;&quot;The right places to look for contagion are therefore not in the white-washed Bear Stearns hedge funds, but in the subprime resets to come and the ultimate effect they will have on the prices of homes -- the collateral that&#039;s so critical in this asset-backed, and therefore interest-sensitive financed-based economy of 2007 and beyond,&quot; he wrote.
&quot;The flaw, dear readers, lies in the homes that were financed with cheap and in some cases gratuitous money in 2004, 2005, and 2006,&quot; he wrote.
&quot;Because while the Bear Stearns hedge funds are now primarily history, those millions and millions of homes are not. They&#039;re not going anywhere...except for their mortgages that is. Mortgage payments are going up, up, and up...and so are delinquencies and defaults.&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/pimcos-gross-predicts-fed-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B9956D6C4%2D489A%2D4481%2D9A0B%2D493EA5AA4D16%7D&quot;&gt;Pimco sees subprime homes, comnsumers&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on May 18th here: <a
href="http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-foreclosures-and-the-subprime-buyers/">Tucson Foreclosures and the subprime buyers</a></p><p>I finally have some &#8220;real&#8221; meat on the bones people agreeing with my stance. Bill Gross of Pimco wrote:</p><p>&#8220;&#8221;The right places to look for contagion are therefore not in the white-washed Bear Stearns hedge funds, but in the subprime resets to come and the ultimate effect they will have on the prices of homes &#8212; the collateral that&#8217;s so critical in this asset-backed, and therefore interest-sensitive financed-based economy of 2007 and beyond,&#8221; he wrote.</p><p>&#8220;The flaw, dear readers, lies in the homes that were financed with cheap and in some cases gratuitous money in 2004, 2005, and 2006,&#8221; he wrote.</p><p>&#8220;Because while the Bear Stearns hedge funds are now primarily history, those millions and millions of homes are not. They&#8217;re not going anywhere&#8230;except for their mortgages that is. Mortgage payments are going up, up, and up&#8230;and so are delinquencies and defaults.&#8221;</p><p><a
href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/pimcos-gross-predicts-fed-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B9956D6C4%2D489A%2D4481%2D9A0B%2D493EA5AA4D16%7D">Pimco sees subprime homes, comnsumers</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bobby joe</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link> <dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-679</guid> <description>Hello Dave!
Check out Lennar&#039;s 2nd Quarter numbers... ouch:
Revenues of $2.9 billion - down 37%
â€“ Loss per share of $1.55 (includes a $1.33 per share charge related to FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs)
â€“ Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)
â€“ Financial Services operating earnings of $14.2 million - down $20.4 million
â€“ Homebuilding debt to total capital improved to 31.6% from 33.5% (net homebuilding debt to total capital of 29.6%)
â€“ Deliveries of 9,568 homes - down 28%
â€“ New orders of 8,056 homes - down 31%; cancellation rate of 29%
â€“ Backlog dollar value of $2.8 billion - down 56%
â€œAs we look to our third quarter and the remainder of 2007, we continue to see weak, and perhaps deteriorating, market conditions,&#039;â€™ Chief Executive Officer Stuart Miller said in the statement. â€œWe currently expect to be in a loss position in our third quarter.&#039;â€™
Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)
The only bright spot is that they have managed to hold their cash position: Homebuilding cash 2007/234,256 2006/164,157</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dave!</p><p>Check out Lennar&#8217;s 2nd Quarter numbers&#8230; ouch:</p><p>Revenues of $2.9 billion &#8211; down 37%<br
/> â€“ Loss per share of $1.55 (includes a $1.33 per share charge related to FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs)<br
/> â€“ Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)<br
/> â€“ Financial Services operating earnings of $14.2 million &#8211; down $20.4 million<br
/> â€“ Homebuilding debt to total capital improved to 31.6% from 33.5% (net homebuilding debt to total capital of 29.6%)<br
/> â€“ Deliveries of 9,568 homes &#8211; down 28%<br
/> â€“ New orders of 8,056 homes &#8211; down 31%; cancellation rate of 29%<br
/> â€“ Backlog dollar value of $2.8 billion &#8211; down 56%</p><p>â€œAs we look to our third quarter and the remainder of 2007, we continue to see weak, and perhaps deteriorating, market conditions,&#8217;â€™ Chief Executive Officer Stuart Miller said in the statement. â€œWe currently expect to be in a loss position in our third quarter.&#8217;â€™</p><p>Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)</p><p>The only bright spot is that they have managed to hold their cash position: Homebuilding cash 2007/234,256 2006/164,157</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bobby joe</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link> <dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:36:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-678</guid> <description>Now, if we could get home owners to realize that 1998 - 2000 prices with 3% growth is a &quot;fair&quot; price... the market would fix itself. Alas, this is probably a dream because homeowners have emotions and are not rational in any sense of the word.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if we could get home owners to realize that 1998 &#8211; 2000 prices with 3% growth is a &#8220;fair&#8221; price&#8230; the market would fix itself. Alas, this is probably a dream because homeowners have emotions and are not rational in any sense of the word.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bobby joe</title><link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link> <dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:32:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-677</guid> <description>Now your talking Dave... Now your talking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now your talking Dave&#8230; Now your talking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
