<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tucson Home Sellers The Big Gamble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/</link>
	<description>&#38; What it is like living in Tucson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby joe</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>As I said on May 18th here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-foreclosures-and-the-subprime-buyers/&quot;&gt;Tucson Foreclosures and the subprime buyers&lt;/a&gt;

I finally have some &quot;real&quot; meat on the bones people agreeing with my stance. Bill Gross of Pimco wrote:

&quot;&quot;The right places to look for contagion are therefore not in the white-washed Bear Stearns hedge funds, but in the subprime resets to come and the ultimate effect they will have on the prices of homes -- the collateral that&#039;s so critical in this asset-backed, and therefore interest-sensitive financed-based economy of 2007 and beyond,&quot; he wrote.

&quot;The flaw, dear readers, lies in the homes that were financed with cheap and in some cases gratuitous money in 2004, 2005, and 2006,&quot; he wrote.

&quot;Because while the Bear Stearns hedge funds are now primarily history, those millions and millions of homes are not. They&#039;re not going anywhere...except for their mortgages that is. Mortgage payments are going up, up, and up...and so are delinquencies and defaults.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/pimcos-gross-predicts-fed-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B9956D6C4%2D489A%2D4481%2D9A0B%2D493EA5AA4D16%7D&quot;&gt;Pimco sees subprime homes, comnsumers&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on May 18th here: <a href="http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-real-estate-market/tucson-foreclosures-and-the-subprime-buyers/">Tucson Foreclosures and the subprime buyers</a></p>
<p>I finally have some &#8220;real&#8221; meat on the bones people agreeing with my stance. Bill Gross of Pimco wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;The right places to look for contagion are therefore not in the white-washed Bear Stearns hedge funds, but in the subprime resets to come and the ultimate effect they will have on the prices of homes &#8212; the collateral that&#8217;s so critical in this asset-backed, and therefore interest-sensitive financed-based economy of 2007 and beyond,&#8221; he wrote.</p>
<p>&#8220;The flaw, dear readers, lies in the homes that were financed with cheap and in some cases gratuitous money in 2004, 2005, and 2006,&#8221; he wrote.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because while the Bear Stearns hedge funds are now primarily history, those millions and millions of homes are not. They&#8217;re not going anywhere&#8230;except for their mortgages that is. Mortgage payments are going up, up, and up&#8230;and so are delinquencies and defaults.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/pimcos-gross-predicts-fed-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B9956D6C4%2D489A%2D4481%2D9A0B%2D493EA5AA4D16%7D">Pimco sees subprime homes, comnsumers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby joe</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Hello Dave!

Check out Lennar&#039;s 2nd Quarter numbers... ouch:

Revenues of $2.9 billion - down 37%
– Loss per share of $1.55 (includes a $1.33 per share charge related to FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs)
– Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)
– Financial Services operating earnings of $14.2 million - down $20.4 million
– Homebuilding debt to total capital improved to 31.6% from 33.5% (net homebuilding debt to total capital of 29.6%)
– Deliveries of 9,568 homes - down 28%
– New orders of 8,056 homes - down 31%; cancellation rate of 29%
– Backlog dollar value of $2.8 billion - down 56%

“As we look to our third quarter and the remainder of 2007, we continue to see weak, and perhaps deteriorating, market conditions,&#039;’ Chief Executive Officer Stuart Miller said in the statement. “We currently expect to be in a loss position in our third quarter.&#039;’

Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)

The only bright spot is that they have managed to hold their cash position: Homebuilding cash 2007/234,256 2006/164,157</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dave!</p>
<p>Check out Lennar&#8217;s 2nd Quarter numbers&#8230; ouch:</p>
<p>Revenues of $2.9 billion &#8211; down 37%<br />
– Loss per share of $1.55 (includes a $1.33 per share charge related to FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs)<br />
– Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)<br />
– Financial Services operating earnings of $14.2 million &#8211; down $20.4 million<br />
– Homebuilding debt to total capital improved to 31.6% from 33.5% (net homebuilding debt to total capital of 29.6%)<br />
– Deliveries of 9,568 homes &#8211; down 28%<br />
– New orders of 8,056 homes &#8211; down 31%; cancellation rate of 29%<br />
– Backlog dollar value of $2.8 billion &#8211; down 56%</p>
<p>“As we look to our third quarter and the remainder of 2007, we continue to see weak, and perhaps deteriorating, market conditions,&#8217;’ Chief Executive Officer Stuart Miller said in the statement. “We currently expect to be in a loss position in our third quarter.&#8217;’</p>
<p>Homebuilding operating loss of $351.7 million (includes $329.1 million of FAS 144 valuation adjustments and write-offs noted above)</p>
<p>The only bright spot is that they have managed to hold their cash position: Homebuilding cash 2007/234,256 2006/164,157</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby joe</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Now, if we could get home owners to realize that 1998 - 2000 prices with 3% growth is a &quot;fair&quot; price... the market would fix itself. Alas, this is probably a dream because homeowners have emotions and are not rational in any sense of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if we could get home owners to realize that 1998 &#8211; 2000 prices with 3% growth is a &#8220;fair&#8221; price&#8230; the market would fix itself. Alas, this is probably a dream because homeowners have emotions and are not rational in any sense of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby joe</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/tucson-home-selling-resources/tucson-home-sellers-the-big-gamble/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Now your talking Dave... Now your talking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now your talking Dave&#8230; Now your talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
