<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tucson Real Estate Beautiful Seductive Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/</link>
	<description>&#38; What it is like living in Tucson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: concerned ;-) from the other blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned ;-) from the other blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info, Dave. That is a big, serious camera!;-) Very pretty pictures, though!

Gadget-wise, I&#039;m still in the Stone Age. Why do I bother asking...?!;-) Don&#039;t even have a digital camera. Ever since I saw the grainy pictures coming out of one of the first models, I&#039;m just biased... That&#039;s not the only reason, of course. They&#039;ve improved a lot since those days. I just hate any gadget manual, trying to figure it out... get frustrated. The more options they have, the crazier they drive me.;-) My general technical impairment is most likely the problem ;-)), but I still think pictures of people taken with digital cameras are not as good because the taking of the picture is somehow delayed... or you don&#039;t know exactly when it&#039;s being taken... not sure if I&#039;m making myself understood and I may very well be totally wrong, but that&#039;s how it feels to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, Dave. That is a big, serious camera!;-) Very pretty pictures, though!</p>
<p>Gadget-wise, I&#8217;m still in the Stone Age. Why do I bother asking&#8230;?!;-) Don&#8217;t even have a digital camera. Ever since I saw the grainy pictures coming out of one of the first models, I&#8217;m just biased&#8230; That&#8217;s not the only reason, of course. They&#8217;ve improved a lot since those days. I just hate any gadget manual, trying to figure it out&#8230; get frustrated. The more options they have, the crazier they drive me.;-) My general technical impairment is most likely the problem <img src='http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but I still think pictures of people taken with digital cameras are not as good because the taking of the picture is somehow delayed&#8230; or you don&#8217;t know exactly when it&#8217;s being taken&#8230; not sure if I&#8217;m making myself understood and I may very well be totally wrong, but that&#8217;s how it feels to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>First, working on the stats as I write, should be up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/&quot;&gt;Tucson Real Estate in The News&lt;/a&gt; in an hour or so.

Second, Photoshopped in the sense I adjust the brightness and contrast for the web. I&#039;m using Fireworks, Photoshop Element and Capture NX 1.2. Fireworks for the drop shadows, Elements for shadow and highlights, Capture to brighten dark areas only, Elements works on the entire image, Capture on color points I can set.

I shot almost all the time with a polarizing filter.

Camera is a Nikon D40 6 megapixel. I&#039;ll have a couple of night shots for here once I get the Statistics report posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, working on the stats as I write, should be up on <a href="http://www.barbaralasky.com/tucson-real-estate-blog/">Tucson Real Estate in The News</a> in an hour or so.</p>
<p>Second, Photoshopped in the sense I adjust the brightness and contrast for the web. I&#8217;m using Fireworks, Photoshop Element and Capture NX 1.2. Fireworks for the drop shadows, Elements for shadow and highlights, Capture to brighten dark areas only, Elements works on the entire image, Capture on color points I can set.</p>
<p>I shot almost all the time with a polarizing filter.</p>
<p>Camera is a Nikon D40 6 megapixel. I&#8217;ll have a couple of night shots for here once I get the Statistics report posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned ;-) from the other blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned ;-) from the other blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonazrealestateblog.com/tucson-real-estate/tucson-real-estate-beautiful-seductive-views/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Patiently waiting for better stats and absorption rates and enjoying the pictures in the meantime.:-)

Your pictures are unbelievably beautiful!:-) I can bet the places don&#039;t even look as good up close and personal.;-) Are they photoshopped at all? I know it takes talent as well, but what camera are you using? Is it something too professional and expensive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patiently waiting for better stats and absorption rates and enjoying the pictures in the meantime.:-)</p>
<p>Your pictures are unbelievably beautiful!:-) I can bet the places don&#8217;t even look as good up close and personal.;-) Are they photoshopped at all? I know it takes talent as well, but what camera are you using? Is it something too professional and expensive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
